Southern Surety Co. v. Municipal Excavator Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Oklahoma County; John W. Hayson, Judge. Action by the Municipal Excavator Company against the Southern Surety Company and another. Judgment for plaintiff, and the Surety Company brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion bv
GALBRAITH, C.
The Municipal Excavator Company broubht action against the Southern Surety Company and Nick Peay, upon a bond given in pursu anee of sections 3881 and 3882, Rev. Laws 1910. The allegations of the petition, so far as important to be noticed here, arc: That the Southern Surety Company does a general bonding business throughout the state of Oklahoma. That Nick Peay, doing business under the name of Nick Peay Construction
Company, as principal, and the. Southern Surety Company as surety, executed and filed with the clerk of the district court of McIntosh county a certain…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Hill v. American Surety Co. of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Kansas City ex rel. Kansas City Hydraulic Press Brick Co. v. YoumansSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
- Potter Manufacturing Co. v. A. B. Meyer & Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1909
- Whiteacre v. NicholsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1906
- City of Alpena ex rel. Besser v. Title Guaranty & Surety Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1909
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Pettis v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Franzen v. Southern Surety Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1926
- Tom P. McDermott, Inc. v. BennettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
- Southern Surety Co. v. Metropolitan Sewerage CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
- Home Insurance Co. of N.Y. v. WhitchurchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.