Legal Opinion

Bernardo v. Soderman

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 21, 1912No. Civ. No. 984PublishedCited by 6 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County. T. W. Harris, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtLennon, P. J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in an action wherein the plaintiffs sought to recover the sum of $835.50, claimed and admitted to have heen paid to the defendant by the plaintiffs as the purchasers of certain real property pursuant to the terms of an installment contract. The case was tried by the lower court and submitted for decision upon an agreed statement of facts, which, by stipulation of the parties, constitute the trial court’s findings of fact. It was also stipulated in the court below by the parties to the action that judgment might be rendered, in accordance with the law, upon…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Glock v. Howard & Wilson Colony Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Drew v. PedlarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Shively v. Semi-Tropic Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Merrill v. MerrillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Heilig v. ParlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Winter v. KittoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  2. Jones v. GroveWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Paap v. Von HelmholtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. Connelly v. MalloyWashington Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Jackson v. WhiteWashington Supreme Court · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API