Jones v. Grove
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal by defendants from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Dykeman, J., entered March 22, 1913, dismissing without prejudice an action for equitable relief and also the cross-complaint, after a trial on the merits to the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.
The purpose of this action on the part of the plaintiffs was to have declared void, pursuant to their prior notice of rescission, a contract for the sale of real estate and to quiet the title; and on the part of the defendants, to recover, by way of cross-complaint, certain sums which had been paid to the plaintiffs upon the contract and for taxes.
On November 7, 1910, the plaintiffs and the defendant Richard M. Grove executed a written contract wherein the plaintiffs agreed to sell and convey to Richard M. Grove, and he agreed to buy, certain real estate therein particularly described. The…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lytle v. Scottish American Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Maffet v. Oregon & Cal. RailroadOregon Supreme Court · 1905
- Ankeny v. ClarkWashington Supreme Court · 1889
- Pedley v. FreemenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
- Bernardo v. SodermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
3Cited by16 opinions
- Ihrke v. Continental Life Insurance & Investment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
- Barton v. TombariWashington Supreme Court · 1922
- Mortensen v. Frederickson Bros.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1921
- Lea v. YoungWashington Supreme Court · 1932
- Tungsten Products, Inc. v. KimmelWashington Supreme Court · 1940
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.