Bay Mills Indian Community v. State
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtB. B. Mackenzie, J.
Plaintiff appeals as of right from orders granting summary disposition to defendants. As relevant to this appeal, plaintiff alleged that the state of Michigan and the Governor and his predecessors (defendants) wrongfully allowed plaintiff’s predecessors’ real property to be sold at tax sale in violation of the laws of the United States and the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the United States and Michigan Constitutions. We affirm.
factual background
In 1855, the United States entered into a treaty with plaintiff’s predecessors, reserving certain land for them in Chippewa County. On…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- County of Yakima v. Confederated Tribes & Bands of the Yakima Indian NationSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Federal Power Commission v. Tuscarora Indian NationSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- South Carolina v. Catawba Indian Tribe, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Meyer & Anna Prentis Family Foundation, Inc. v. Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer InstituteMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005
- Chippewa Trading Co. v. CoxCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Cass County Joint Water Resource District v. 1.43 Acres of Land in Highland TownshipNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- Oneida Tribe of Indians v. Village of HobartDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2008
- Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida v. Department of Environmental Protection Ex Rel. Board of TrusteesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.