County of Yakima v. Confederated Tribes & Bands of the Yakima Indian Nation
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scalia
The question presented by these consolidated cases is whether the County of Yakima may impose an ad valorem tax on so-called “fee-patented” land located within the Yakima Indian Reservation, and an excise tax on sales of such land.
I
A
In the late 19th century, the prevailing national policy of segregating lands for the exclusive use and control of the *254Indian tribes gave way to a policy of allotting those lands to tribe members individually. The objectives of allotment were simple and clear cut: to extinguish tribal sovereignty, erase reservation boundaries, and force the assimilation of Indians…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Morton v. MancariSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Worcester v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by311 opinions
- Cobell, Elouise v. Norton, Gale A.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
- Minnesota v. Mille Lacs Band of Chippewa IndiansSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Plains Commerce Bank v. Long Family Land & Cattle Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Chickasaw NationSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Hagen v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
306 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.