Legal Opinion

County of Yakima v. Confederated Tribes & Bands of the Yakima Indian Nation

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 14, 1992No. 90-408PublishedCited by 311 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scalia

The question presented by these consolidated cases is whether the County of Yakima may impose an ad valorem tax on so-called “fee-patented” land located within the Yakima Indian Reservation, and an excise tax on sales of such land.

I

A

In the late 19th century, the prevailing national policy of segregating lands for the exclusive use and control of the *254Indian tribes gave way to a policy of allotting those lands to tribe members individually. The objectives of allotment were simple and clear cut: to extinguish tribal sovereignty, erase reservation boundaries, and force the assimilation of Indians…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  2. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Morton v. MancariSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Worcester v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  5. Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by311 opinions

  1. Cobell, Elouise v. Norton, Gale A.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
  2. Minnesota v. Mille Lacs Band of Chippewa IndiansSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Plains Commerce Bank v. Long Family Land & Cattle Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  4. Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Chickasaw NationSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Hagen v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

306 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API