Legal Opinion

Federal Power Commission v. Tuscarora Indian Nation

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 18, 1960No. 63PublishedCited by 276 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Whittaker

The ultimate question presented by these cases is whether certain lands, purchased and owned in fee simple by the Tuscarora Indian Nation and lying adjacent to a natural power site on the Niagara River near the town of Lewiston, New York, may be taken for the storage reservoir of a hydroelectric power project, upon the payment of just compensation, by the Power Authority of the State of New York under a license issued to it by the Federal Power Commission as directed by Congress in Public Law 85-159, approved August 21, 1957, 71 Stat. 401.

The Niagara River, an international boundary stream…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Helvering v. Stockholms Enskilda BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Kohl v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  4. Lone Wolf v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  5. Irwin v. GavitSupreme Court of the United States · 1925

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by276 opinions

  1. Countyof Oneida v. Oneida Indian Nation of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Central Intelligence Agency v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Heckler v. MathewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. United States v. Sioux Nation of IndiansSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. United States v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007

271 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API