Legal Opinion
Oneida Tribe of Indians v. Village of Hobart
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided March 28, 2008No. 06-C-1302PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER
WILLIAM C. GRIESBACH, District Judge.
At issue in this important case is the status of land located within the original boundaries of the Oneida Reservation that has been reacquired by the Oneida Tribe of Indians of Wisconsin (“the Tribe”) several generations after title to the land lawfully passed to non-Indians. The Tribe filed this action against the Village of Hobart (“the Village”) seeking a declaration that the Village has no authority to condemn a portion of its newly acquired property for a public roadway or to charge such property with the costs of public…
2Cases cited62 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- United States v. WheelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Worcester v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Oneida Nation v. Village of Hobart, WisconsinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
- Public Service Co. of New Mexico v. BarboanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- Oneida Nation v. Village of Hobart, WisconsinDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2019
- Armijo v. PUEBLO OF LAGUNANew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2010
- Oneida Tribe of Indians v. Village of HobartDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2012
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.