Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Per curiam
We consider whether the plaintiffs’ fifth and fourteenth amendment challenges to the defendants’ 1984 Regional Plan have been rendered moot by the defendants’ revocation of the challenged plan and its replacement with a substantially different one. We also consider whether the plaintiffs’ claims are ripe for adjudication in federal court.
I. Facts
This case involves a challenge by 365 property owners on the Nevada side of the Lake Tahoe basin who claim that the ban on development established by Tahoe Regional Planning Agency (“TRPA”)1 Ordinance 81-5 (enacted June 25, 1981) and made permanent by…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Lake Country Estates, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- MacDonald, Sommer & Frates v. Yolo CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Margaret Kinzli Evelyn Goossen Philip Kinzli Ernest Kinzli, Plaintiffs v. City of Santa CruzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Suitum v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Del Monte Dunes at Monterey, Ltd. Monterey-Del Monte Dunes Corporation v. City of MontereyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Cook Inlet Treaty Tribes v. ShalalaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Lakeview Development Corp. v. City of South Lake TahoeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Esposito v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.