Legal Opinion
Esposito v. South Carolina Coastal Council
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided July 3, 1991No. Nos. 89-1840, 90-2367PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WIDENER, Circuit Judge:
These consolidated cases deal with challenges to the judgments of the district court concerning claims that the defendants violated the fifth and fourteenth amendments of the United States Constitution. The district court in Esposito, No. 89-1140, rejected the plaintiffs’ claim that South Carolina’s Beachfront Management Act (Act) violated the due process and takings clauses of the fifth and fourteenth amendments. In Chavous, however, No. 90-2367, the district court entered judgment for the plaintiffs on their claim that the Act violated the takings clause and enjoined…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. Munsingwear, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Mayhew v. Town of SunnyvaleTexas Supreme Court · 1998
- National Advertising Company v. City of Raleigh, North Carolina, Southern Environmental Law Center, Amicus CuriaeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
- Parella v. Retirement Board of the Rhode Island Employees' Retirement SystemCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- Del Monte Dunes at Monterey, Ltd. v. City of Monterey, Del Monte Dunes at Monterey, Ltd., and Monterey-Del Monte Dunes Corporation v. City of MontereyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.