Legal Opinion
Margaret Kinzli Evelyn Goossen Philip Kinzli Ernest Kinzli, Plaintiffs v. City of Santa Cruz
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 7, 1987No. 86-1504, 86-1624PublishedCited by 143 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, Circuit Judge:
The Kinzli plaintiffs (Kinzlis) brought this action against the City of Santa Cruz (City), alleging that the City violated their federal and state rights as property owners. The Kinzlis now appeal the district court’s holdings in favor of the City, specifically: (1) the district court’s dismissal on the merits of the Kinzlis’ claim that the adoption of a local ordinance deprived them of their property without just compensation in violation of the fifth and fourteenth amendments of the United States Constitution; (2) the district court’s dismissal on the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Agins v. City of TiburonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by143 opinions
- Mayhew v. Town of SunnyvaleTexas Supreme Court · 1998
- William St. Clair John Shelton v. City of Chico County of ButteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Howard H. Gilbert, Jr. v. City of CambridgeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Sinaloa Lake Owners Ass'n v. City of Simi ValleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Elling O. Eide v. Sarasota County, a Political Subdivision of the State of FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
138 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.