Indianapolis, Peru & Chicago R. R. v. Lindley
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Marion Superior Court.
1Opinion of the CourtWoods, J.
Action by the appellee against the appellant, for the killing of a cow upon the track of the appellant’s railroad, at a point where the road was not fenced. Error is assigned upon the overruling of a demurrer to the evidence, offered by the plaintiff. Counsel are agreed that the only question is whether the road ought to have been fenced at the point where the cow was killed. The burden of proof that the road was not fenced at the place, of the killing, or of the animal’s entry upon the track, was upon the appellee; but that it was.not the company’s duty to fence at that place, was matter of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Jeffersonville, Madison, & Indianapolis Railroad v. BrevoortIndiana Supreme Court · 1868
- J., M. & I. R. R. v. LyonIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
- Jeffersonville, Madison, & Indianapolis-Railroad v. O'ConnorIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
3Cited by13 opinions
- Indianapolis, Peru & Chicago Railway Co. v. ThomasIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Fort Wayne, Cincinnati & Louisville Railroad v. HerboldIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Co. v. TrettsIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Evansville & Terre Haute Railroad v. TiptonIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.