Legal Opinion

Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Co. v. Tretts

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 1884No. 10,792PublishedCited by 9 opinions

From the DeKalb Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, C. J.

This action was brought by appellee to-recover the value of a mare, alleged to have entered upon appellant’s track at a point where it was not fenced, and to have been killed by the appellant’s locomotive.

A motion to strike out part of the complaint was overruled, and this ruling is assigned as error. Many cases decide that such a ruling, even though erroneous, will not warrant a reversal.

The place of entry is the material question in eases of this character. If animals enter at a place where the railroad company was bound to fence, the company is liable, although they were killed at a point…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. City of Delphi v. LoweryIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Indianapolis, Peru & Chicago Railway Co. v. ThomasIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Wabash Railway Co. v. ForsheeIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Indianapolis & Cincinnati Railroad v. AdkinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
  5. J., M. & I. R. R. v. LyonIndiana Supreme Court · 1880

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. McKelvey v. Ches. & Ohio R'y Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Wabash Railway Co. v. WilliamsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Fort Wayne, Cincinnati & Louisville Railroad v. HerboldIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Marshall v. State ex rel. ShryerIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Midland Valley R. Co. v. BryantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API