Legal Opinion

St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Brown

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 9, 1912No. 1368PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Error from Marshall County Court; J. W. Palkner, Jtidge. Action by M. E. Brown against the St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

SHARP, C.

This action was originally brought before a justice of the peace in Marshall county. On the trial, the plaintiff prevailed. Upon appeal to the county court, plaintiff again recovered judgment.

Marshall county is situated in what was formerly the Indian Territory, and, prior to admission into the Union of the state of Oklahoma, the eastern part thereof, commonly known as the Indian Territory, was without a law restraining domestic animals; but, on the contrary, such animals were permitted to run at large. Article 1, c. 1, p. 39, Sess. Laws 1903, providing for a herd law, was…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. I. & G. N. R. R. Co. v. CockeTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Gulf, C. & S. F. R. Co. v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1892
  3. Wilder v. Chicago & West Michigan Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Davis & YoungSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  5. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. ShepherdSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Pure Oil Co. v. GearSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  2. Whitcomb v. OllerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. SavageSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. Anderson v. WhitenerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  5. Miller v. DobbsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API