Legal Opinion

State v. Riley

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 21, 2013No. C082793CR; A146201PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSercombe, J.

Following a jury trial, defendant was convicted of one count of sodomy in the first degree, ORS 163.405, and two counts of sexual abuse in the first degree, ORS 163.427. On appeal, he raises four assignments of error, the last of which we reject without discussion. Defendant first assigns error to the trial court’s admission of certain hearsay statements made by the victim, arguing that the state’s notice of its intent to offer those statements was insufficient under OEC 803 (18a) (b), which provides an exception to the general rule excluding hearsay, OEC 802. In his second and third…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State v. WyattOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. SerranoOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Kahn v. Pony Express Courier Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  5. State v. LeahyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hagberg v. CourseyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  2. State v. AshkinsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  3. State v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API