Legal Opinion

State v. Leahy

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 22, 2003No. 000092CR; A114650PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, P. J.

Defendant was convicted after a trial to the court of four counts of sodomy in the first degree. ORS 163.405. He appeals the convictions, assigning error to the state’s failure to give timely notice of its intent to offer certain hearsay statements by the victim and to the admission of testimony that he claims impermissibly commented on the credibility of another witness’s testimony. We reverse and remand.

OEC 803(18a)(b) provides an exception to the general rule excluding hearsay, OEC 802. Under OEC 803(18a)(b), out of court statements made by victims of certain kinds of crimes may be…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. EhlyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. MiddletonOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State v. MilbradtOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State v. KellerOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State v. RemmeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. TorresCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  2. State v. BradleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  3. State v. ChaseCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  4. Hagberg v. CourseyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  5. Mesta v. FrankeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API