Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Fehsefeldt

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 23, 1910No. Nos. 16,903—(195)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Action in tbe district court for Grant county to recover possession of certain crops or $250, their value, and for $100 damages. The substance of the pleadings is stated in the opinion. The reply was a general denial. The case was tried before Flaherty, J., and a jury which returned a verdict in favor of plaintiffs for $68.34. From an order denying defendant’s motion to set aside the verdict or for a new trial, he appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.

This action was brought to recover possession of four hundred thirty-three bushels of wheat, four hundred seventy-two bushels of oats, and five hundred thirty-one bushels of flax, alleged to have been in appellant’s possession in his granary on his farm, upon which respondents had filed a lien for the threshing bill, amounting to $133.-27, at the agreed price of ten cents per bushel for the wheat, six cents per bushel for oats, and fifteen cents per bushel for the flax.

*119In defense, the answer set np a contract that appellant agreed to pay the amounts per bushel above stated, in consideration…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. v. Home InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  2. Johnson v. HillstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
  3. Rosby v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
  4. Larson v. SchmausSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
  5. Griggs v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1866

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Finn v. Modern Brotherhood of AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  2. Forney v. Farmers Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API