Johnson v. Hillstrom
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Good-hue county, McGluer, J., presiding, refusing a new trial, after a verdict for plaintiff.
1Opinion of the CourtVanderburgh, J.
This action is for wages alleged to be due plaintiff from defendant. The defendant avers payment, at plaintiff’s request, to a third person for a horse alleged to have been purchased of the latter by the plaintiff. To this a reply is made denying such payment and purchase, and alleging that the horse was purchased of defendant himself upon his solicitation, and her wages agreed to be applied thereon, and that she was induced to enter into such contract through defendant’s false and fraudulent representations touching the' character and quality of the property, and that, upon discovering the…
2Cited by9 opinions
- State v. DorseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- Morrison v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1900
- Forney v. Farmers Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- Harrow v. St. Paul & Duluth RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Solberg v. Robbins Lumber Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.