Legal Opinion
Forney v. Farmers Mutual Fire Insurance
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 20, 1930No. 27,889PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.
Defendant appealed from an order denying its motion for judgment non obstante or a new trial.
A farm was deeded to “Jesse C. Forney and Clasiena Forney, or the survivor of either.” They were husband and wife. A barn on the premises was insured with defendant, a farmers township mutual insurance company. The first five-year policy expired March 3, 1926. On March 26, 1926, a new policy was issued. Like the prior one, it was issued, in the name of J. C. Forney. Mr. Forney died September' 26, 1926. Soon thereafter Clasiena Forney wrote a letter to the treasurer of defendant informing him of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Farmers Mutual Fire Insurance v. JackmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905
- Finn v. Modern Brotherhood of AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
- Johnson v. HillstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
- Rosby v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
- Clearwater County State Bank v. Bagley-Ogema Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Switzer v. PrattSupreme Court of Iowa · 1946
- Irvine v. HelveringCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
- Papke v. PearsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
- Hruby v. WaymanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1941
- Hanson v. Fidelity Mutual Benefit Corp.Superior Court of Delaware · 1940
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.