Legal Opinion

Childers Meat Co. v. City of Eugene

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 20, 2019No. A163402Published

1Opinion of the CourtShorr, J.

*1002*670Plaintiffs, a group of businesses located within the City of Eugene (city), appeal a judgment of the trial court declaring that Eugene's "hazardous substance user fee," which was enacted by the city council in 2001 as part of the Eugene City Code (Eugene Code), is valid. Plaintiffs also challenge the validity of hazardous substance reporting requirements-part of a Toxics Right-to-Know program-enacted as an amendment to the city charter by the city's voters. We conclude that the trial court did not err when it entered a judgment declaring that the city's imposition of the hazardous…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. League of Oregon Cities v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 2002
  2. EACRET ET UX v. HolmesOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Morgan v. Sisters School District 6Oregon Supreme Court · 2013
  4. At&T Communications of Pacific Northwest, Inc. v. City of EugeneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  5. Savage v. MunnOregon Supreme Court · 1993

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API