Legal Opinion

League of Oregon Cities v. State

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 2002No. CC 00C-20156; CA A113789; SC S48450; CC 00C-19871; CA A113790; SC S48451PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*649CARSON, C. J.

In these two consolidated proceedings, plaintiffs seek to invalidate Ballot Measure 7 (2000), set out post, 334 Or at 665-67, an initiated amendment to the Oregon Constitution that the voters approved at the 2000 general election. The trial court agreed with plaintiffs that Measure 7 was adopted in violation of the “separate-vote” requirement of Article XVII, section 1, of the Oregon Constitution, also set out post. The trial court therefore declared Measure 7 to be invalid and entered judgment accordingly. The state1 appealed to the Court of Appeals, that court certified the…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Kadderly v. PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Caseday v. LindstromOregon Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Armatta v. KitzhaberOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Eckles v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Brown v. Oregon State BarOregon Supreme Court · 1982

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Couey v. AtkinsOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Espinoza v. Evergreen Helicopters, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2016
  3. MacPherson v. Department of Administrative ServicesOregon Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Morgan v. Sisters School District 6Oregon Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Doyle v. City of MedfordOregon Supreme Court · 2014

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API