Legal Opinion

Morgan v. Sisters School District 6

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 17, 2013No. CC 08-CV-0423AB; CA A142252; SC S059465PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.

At issue in this case is whether plaintiff has standing under the Uniform Declaratory Judgments Act, ORS 28.020, to seek a declaration that defendant Sisters School District #6 and its Board of Directors (board) lacked authority to enter into a particular form of financing arrangement without a vote of the people. Plaintiff alleged that he has standing because his “status as a taxpayer and voter within the district will or may be adversely affected [.]” More specifically, plaintiff alleged that entering into the challenged form of financing arrangement might, in some unspecified way,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Eckles v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Brown v. Oregon State BarOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Barcik v. KubiaczykOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  4. North Pacific Insurance v. HamiltonOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Cummings Construction Co. v. School District No. 9Oregon Supreme Court · 1965

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Couey v. AtkinsOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Doyle v. City of MedfordOregon Supreme Court · 2014
  3. MT & M Gaming, Inc. v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Hale v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  5. Hicks v. Central Point School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API