Legal Opinion
Savage v. Munn
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided August 5, 1993No. OTC 3075; SC S39254PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.
Plaintiffs appeal a decision of the Oregon Tax Court holding that Article XI, section llb(4), of the Oregon Constitution does not violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. Savage v. Munn, 12 OTR 145 (1992). For the reasons that follow, we affirm the judgment of the Tax Court.
In 1990, Oregon voters adopted an initiative measure (Measure 5) that amended the Oregon Constitution by-adding Article XI, section lib. Subsection (1) of that constitutional provision limits the total amount of property taxes that can be imposed for public…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Nordlinger v. HahnSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Vance v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Carmichael v. Southern Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Lehnhausen v. Lake Shore Auto Parts Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Allied Stores of Ohio, Inc. v. BowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Couey v. AtkinsOregon Supreme Court · 2015
- Barcik v. KubiaczykOregon Supreme Court · 1995
- McIntire v. ForbesOregon Supreme Court · 1996
- In Re Initiative Petition No. 362 State Question 669Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Matanuska-Susitna Borough School District v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.