Legal Opinion
At&T Communications of Pacific Northwest, Inc. v. City of Eugene
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided October 31, 2001No. 16-98-12672; A105861PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.
At issue in this case is the validity of a City of Eugene (city) ordinance that imposes various fees and regulatory requirements on telecommunications providers that offer telecommunications services in the city. AT&T Communications of the Pacific Northwest, Inc. (AT&T Communications), and AT&T Wireless Services of Oregon, Inc. (AT&T Wireless), complain that the ordinance is preempted by state and federal law. The trial court agreed and entered summary judgment declaring the ordinance invalid and enjoining the city from enforcing it. The city appeals, arguing that the trial court erred in…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Sprint Telephony PCS, L.P. v. County of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- US West Communications, Inc. v. City of EugeneOregon Supreme Court · 2003
- Qwest Communications Corp. v. City of BerkeleyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2002
- Qwest Corp. v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Thunderbird Mobile Club, LLC v. City of WilsonvilleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.