Legal Opinion

Ames v. State Bar

California Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1973No. S.F. 22800PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Trepel, Gingerich & Hoss and Anthony J. Trepel for Petitioners.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THE COURT.

This is a proceeding to review a recommendation of the Disciplinary Board of the State Bar (Board) that petitioners be privately reproved.

Petitioner James Edwin Bean, Jr., was admitted to practice in 1948: petitioner Gerald B. Ames in 1962. Neither petitioner has been involved in prior disciplinary proceedings.

In 1968 petitioners were charged with having wilfully violated their oath and duties as attorneys (Bus. & Prof. Code, §§ 6103, 6067, 6068), the commission of acts involving moral turpitude, dishonesty and corruption (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 6106), and with a wilfull…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. In Re BlaneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Anderson v. EatonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  3. In Re RothrockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Keenan v. Board of Law Examiners of State of NCDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1970
  5. Trafton v. YoungbloodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. People v. CoronaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  2. Day v. RosenthalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  3. Spindell v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Hawk v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Silver v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API