Cty. Bank of San Luis Obispo v. Jack
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
The record purports to present appeals from the judgment and from the order denying the plaintiff’s motion for a new trial. The judgment was entered in the court below on June 20, 1903, and the notice of appeal from the judgment was served and filed on December '23, 1903, which was more than six months after the entry of the judgment, and consequently after the time within which sued appeal could be taken had expired. This court, therefore, has no jurisdiction of that appeal, and the questions arising upon the judgment-roll cannot be considered. The objection of the respondent, that the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Duncan v. RamishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- People v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Swift v. Occidental Mining & Petroleum Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
- Drake v. DuvenickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
- Pacific Paving Co. v. VizelichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Ransome-Crummey Co. v. BennettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- McArthur v. GoodwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Great Western Gold Co. v. ChambersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Kaufmann v. California Mining & Dredging SyndicateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Bird v. MurphyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.