Legal Opinion

Sherman v. Ayers

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 28, 1912No. Civ. No. 1220PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Kern County and from an order denying a new trial. Paul W. Bennett, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, P. J.

In the original complaint it was alleged that plaintiff’s assignors undertook the. construction and installation of a certain electric engine under and by virtue of a contract with defendant which specified what should be furnished and installed in connection with the engine, the total price for all of which was five hundred and fifty dollars. The contract contained a warranty as to material and workmanship connected with the installation. The complaint alleged that pursuant to the contract there had been installed, as by the contract specified, the engine and its equipment, and that no part…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Jackson v. Porter Land and Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fairbanks, Morse & Co. v. NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1914
  2. Square Deal MacHine Co. v. Garrett Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. Advance Rumely Thresher Co. v. McCoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Imperial Gas Engine Co. v. AuteriCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API