Jackson v. Porter Land and Water Co.
California Supreme Court
. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLorigan, J.
This action was brought to recover the •contract price for furnishing and erecting pumping machinery.
The trial court found that the parties entered into a contract on June 2, 1902, whereby plaintiff was to erect on the premises of defendant a pumping plant consisting of a thirty-five actual horsepower Olds distillate engine with a 110-gallon oil tank, together with a horizontal centrifugal pump of a capacity to elevate three hundred and fifty inches of water twenty-four feet high; said plant and all connections to be first-class and connected with defendant’s fifteen wells; the plant to be…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Reed v. . RandallNew York Court of Appeals · 1864
- Brown v. . FosterNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Palmer v. BanfieldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
- Carleton v. JenksCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1897
- Tufts v. MabieCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1898
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- North Alaska Salmon Co. v. Hobbs, Wall & Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Fairbanks, Morse & Co. v. NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1914
- Burrell v. Southern California Canning Co.California Court of Appeal · 1917
- Pacific Commercial Co. v. GreerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- American Steel Pipe & Tank Co. v. HubbardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.