Legal Opinion

Imperial Gas Engine Co. v. Auteri

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 24, 1919No. Civ. No. 2099PublishedCited by 2 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. John J. Van Nostrand, Judge. Affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, P. J.

Plaintiff brought suit against defendant to recover the sum of $335 alleged to be due as the final payment for one 8 horse-power gasoline engine, which plaintiff had installed in defendant’s boat. Defendant bad judgment and plaintiff appeals.. Defendant, who is a fisherman by trade, desired to purchase a gasoline engine for a boat used in Ms business. He negotiated with plaintiff and a contract was made for the sale by plaintiff and purchase by defendant of -“One 8 H. P. (actual brake test) Imperial S/C gasoline engine,” together with certain equipment. By the terms of the contract the engine…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kline v. Santa Barbara Etc. Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Jackson v. Porter Land and Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Hardee v. CarterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
  4. Sherman v. AyersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Square Deal MacHine Co. v. Garrett Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1954
  2. The Gladium Co., Inc. v. ThatcherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API