Legal Opinion

Square Deal MacHine Co. v. Garrett Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 25, 1954No. Civ. 20124PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOSK, J. pro tem. *

Appellant corporation appeals from an adverse judgment, after trial by jury in the court below, and maintains it should have prevailed as a matter of law under the attendant circumstances.

Respondent corporation, which we shall call Square Deal, operated a machine shop in South Gate, county of Los Angeles, for precision lathe and milling machine production. Appellant corporation, hereinafter referred to as Garrett, operated a plant and a retail sales and supply department in Vernon, also located in the county of Los Angeles. The companies were well known to each other…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Polk v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Whitfield v. JessupCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Firth v. RichterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  4. Gratz v. SchulerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
  5. Jackson v. Porter Land and Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1907

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hernandez v. Badger Construction Equipment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1994
  2. Gilmore v. St. Anthony HospitalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
  3. Moore v. Federal Pacific Electric Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Quevedo v. BragaAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1977
  5. Oregon Azaleas, Inc. v. Western Farm Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API