Square Deal MacHine Co. v. Garrett Corp.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
MOSK, J. pro tem. *
Appellant corporation appeals from an adverse judgment, after trial by jury in the court below, and maintains it should have prevailed as a matter of law under the attendant circumstances.
Respondent corporation, which we shall call Square Deal, operated a machine shop in South Gate, county of Los Angeles, for precision lathe and milling machine production. Appellant corporation, hereinafter referred to as Garrett, operated a plant and a retail sales and supply department in Vernon, also located in the county of Los Angeles. The companies were well known to each other…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Polk v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Whitfield v. JessupCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Firth v. RichterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Gratz v. SchulerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
- Jackson v. Porter Land and Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hernandez v. Badger Construction Equipment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1994
- Gilmore v. St. Anthony HospitalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
- Moore v. Federal Pacific Electric Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1980
- Quevedo v. BragaAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1977
- Oregon Azaleas, Inc. v. Western Farm Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.