Legal Opinion

Advance Rumely Thresher Co. v. McCoy

California Supreme Court

Decided July 30, 1931No. Docket No. S.F. 13463PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendant on his cross-complaint in an action to recover on two promissory notes given to secure payment of the purchase price of two 16-foot cut Hillside combined harvesters delivered to the defendant by the plaintiff. The defendant by answer denied the indebtedness and by cross-complaint sought to have the notes canceled on the ground of fraud and deception, alleged a cause of action based on breach of warranty, and prayed for a judgment of rescission and damages.

The defendant is the owner of a large acreage of farm land near Helm…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Luitweiler Pumping Engine Co. v. Ukiah Water & Improvement Co.California Court of Appeal · 1911
  2. Ventura Manufacturing & Implement v. WarfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
  3. Lichtenthaler v. Samson Iron WorksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
  4. Williams v. Bullock Tractor Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Sherman v. AyersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hayssen Manufacturing Co. v. MootzWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Jackson v. ParsleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API