Poore v. Swan Quarter Farms, Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WHICHARD, Judge.
The parties offered and the court considered only the pleadings in determining defendants’ motions for judgment on the pleadings, summary judgment, and dismissal for failure to state a claim. It did not consider any “affidavits, depositions, answers to interrogatories, admissions, documentary materials, facts which are subject to judicial notice, [or] any other materials which would be admissible in evidence at trial.” Huss v. Huss, 31 N.C. App. 463, 466, 230 S.E. 2d 159, 162 (1976). Therefore, we must consider the ruling to have been under N.C. Gen. Stat. 1A-1, Rule 12(c) for…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- King v. GrindstaffSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- Orange & Rockland Utilities, Inc. v. Philwold Estates, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Masters v. DunstanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Huss v. HussCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
- Hayes v. RicardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Poore v. Swan Quarter Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
- Swan Quarter Farms, Inc. v. SpencerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
- Kuhn v. WilliamsonDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1988
- Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. v. MarilleyNorth Carolina Business Court · 2026
- MTGLQ Investors, L.P. v. CurninCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.