Legal Opinion

Masters v. Dunstan

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 21, 1962No. 19PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

In an action by a client against his attorney, the attorney is not liable for negligence in the conduct of litigation where, notwithstanding such negligence in defense of a suit, the client has no meritorious defense. 7 C.J.S., Attorney and Client, s. 146, p. 983: Frost v. Hanscome, 246 P. 53 (Cal. 1926).

Defendant alleges that it has been determined by final judgment in a court of competent jurisdiction that plaintiffs had no meritorious defense to the suit prosecuted by J. W. Carey against plaintiffs, and that he is entitled to plead that judgment as an estoppel in this case.

After default…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Armfield v. . MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1852
  2. Leary v. . Land BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  3. Moore v. DealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. Bryant v. . ShieldsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  5. Bryant v. ShieldsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. King v. GrindstaffSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  2. Rorrer v. CookeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  3. State Ex Rel. Tucker v. FrinziSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
  4. Kelly v. Georgia-Pacific LLCDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2009
  5. State v. SummersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API