Huss v. Huss
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, Judge.
The trial court examined the pleadings and heard oral arguments from counsel in ruling on petitioner’s motion. Information adduced from counsel during oral arguments cannot be used to support a motion for summary judgment under Rule 56(c). On a motion for summary judgment the court may consider evidence consisting of affidavits, depositions, answers to interrogatories, admissions, documentary material, facts which are subject to judicial notice, and any other materials which would be admissible in evidence at trial. Koontz v. City of Winston-Salem, 280 N.C. 513, 186 S.E. 2d 897…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Ragsdale v. KennedySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Koontz v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Page v. SloanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Singleton v. StewartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Teachey v. . GurleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Governor's Club, Inc. v. Governors Club Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- Austin Maintenance & Construction, Inc. v. Crowder Construction Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
- Ballinger v. Secretary of the Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
- Strickland v. DoeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
- Flexolite Electrical, Ltd. v. GilliamCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.