Swan Quarter Farms, Inc. v. Spencer
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EAGLES, Chief Judge.
We first consider whether the trial court erred in granting plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment because the trial court should have disregarded the plaintiff’s corporate form to determine the true nature of the real parties and their interests. Defendants contend that if the trial court had examined the plaintiff rather than relying on plaintiff’s corporate identity, “the trial court would have found Mr. Knott seeking to reap an economic windfall as a result of the Van Dorps’ prior self-dealing and breaches of fiduciary duty.” Accordingly, defendants argue that “Mr.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Bangor Punta Operations, Inc. v. Bangor & Aroostook RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Glenn v. WagnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- Morehead v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Barbour v. LittleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- Hensley v. RamseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Carter v. West American InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
- Discovery Ins. Co. v. The NC Dep't of Ins.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
- Insight Health Corp. v. Marquis Diagnostic Imaging of N.C., LLCNorth Carolina Business Court · 2017
- Insight Health Corp. v. Marquis Diagnostic Imaging of N.C., LLCNorth Carolina Business Court · 2018
- Lawrence v. Umlic-Five Corp.North Carolina Business Court · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.