Legal Opinion

Matter of Irizarry

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 21, 1995PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

The District XIV Ethics Committee (DEC) charged respondent with knowing misappropriation of client funds, RPC 1.15 and 8.4(c); gross neglect, RPC 1.1(a); and lack of diligence, RPC 1.3. The Special Master recommended public discipline, and the Disciplinary Review. Board (DRB) recommended disbarment. We agree that the record clearly and convincingly establishes that respondent knowingly misappropriated client funds. Accordingly, *191we adopt the recommendation of the DRB and order that respondent be disbarred.

-I-

Respondent first came to the attention of the Office of Attorney Ethics (OAE) when…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re WilsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  2. Matter of NoonanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  3. Matter of SkevinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  4. Matter of WarhaftigSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  5. Matter of JohnsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re BaileySupreme Court of Delaware · 2003
  2. State v. MahoneyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
  3. In re PomerantzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
  4. Matter of FreimarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
  5. In re a Member of the Bar of the Supreme Court of Delaware: BaileySupreme Court of Delaware · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API