Legal Opinion

Matter of Johnson

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided January 30, 1987PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Per curiam

Acting on a presentment filed by the District V-A Ethics Committee (Essex DEC) and five presentments filed by the District XII Ethics Committee (Union DEC), the Disciplinary Review Board (DRB) determined that respondent, Hubert T. Johnson, had committed numerous ethical infractions. Specifically, the DRB concluded that respondent failed to carry out contracts of employment, in violation of DR 7-101(A)(2); that his misconduct demonstrated a pattern of neglect in his handling of clients’ legal matters, contrary to DR 6-101; and that he kept retainers without performing services therefor,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re WilsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  2. Matter of FleischerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  3. Matter of SkevinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  4. Matter of OrlandoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  5. Matter of BrownSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Matter of KonopkaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
  2. Matter of RothSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  3. Matter of DavisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
  4. Matter of JamesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
  5. Matter of SimeoneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API