Legal Opinion

In Re Bailey

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided May 2, 2003No. 334, 2002PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

821 A.2d 851 (2003)

In the Matter of a Member of the Bar of the Supreme Court of Delaware: James F. BAILEY, Jr., Respondent.

No. 334, 2002.

Supreme Court of Delaware.

Submitted: January 22, 2003.

Decided: May 2, 2003.

Charles J. Slanina, Esquire, Tybout Redfearn & Pell, Wilmington, Delaware, for Respondent.

Mary Susan Much, Esquire, Wilmington, Delaware, for Office of Disciplinary Counsel.

Edward M. McNally, Esquire (argued), Morris, James, Hitchens & Williams LLP, Wilmington, Delaware, and Joseph A. Rosenthal, Esquire, Rosenthal, Monhait, Gross & Goddess, P.A., Wilmington, Delaware, for the amicus…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In Re Caremark International Inc. Derivative LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1996
  2. Tyre v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1980
  3. In Re a Member of the Bar of the Supreme Court of Delaware FigliolaSupreme Court of Delaware · 1995
  4. In Re KennedySupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
  5. In Re ReardonSupreme Court of Delaware · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. In Re FountainSupreme Court of Delaware · 2005
  2. In Re TenenbaumSupreme Court of Delaware · 2007
  3. In Re ShamersSupreme Court of Delaware · 2005
  4. In Re DavisSupreme Court of Delaware · 2012
  5. In Re LandisSupreme Court of Delaware · 2004

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API