Legal Opinion

Engelbrecht v. McCullough

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 1956No. 6040PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STRUCKMEYER, Justice.

This appeal questions the propriety of a denial of certain ancillary relief sought by the appellant in an action for a dissolution and accounting of partnership affairs. Appellant, whom we shall hereafter call plaintiff, and appellees, whom we shall call defendants, on February 23, 1954, entered into a written partnership agreement to carry on the business of cesspool drilling and servicing for a period of two years. Differences, arose between the partners resulting on April 8, 1954, in a written notice of dissolution addressed to plaintiff by defendants. By paragraph 11…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Karrick v. HannamanSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Cotten v. Perishable Air ConditionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Solomon v. KirkwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Atha v. AthaMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Lunt v. Van GordenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Infusaid Corp. v. Intermedics Infusaid, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
  2. Straus v. StrausSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  3. Rosen v. HaddenArizona Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Titus v. Superior Court, Maricopa CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Arthur Engelbrecht v. Myrtle Bowen, Trustee in Bankruptcy, Etc., and in the Matter of Tri-State Drilling Co., Etc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API