Legal Opinion

Rosen v. Hadden

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided November 5, 1956No. 6189PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STRUCKMEYER, Justice.

Judgment in this cause was entered in favor of appellee for the value of improvements placed on property owned by appellant. The trial court sitting without a jury did not make findings of fact or conclusions of law nor were any requested. Therefore, on this appeal all inferences supported by the evidence will be taken in favor of appellee. Owings v. Borrego, 68 Ariz. 405, 206 P.2d 1050.

In the summer of 1953 appellee and one Rotello were engaged in the business of contracting under the firm name of “Had-den-Rotello Company”. This partnership was licensed in June, 1953, to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Engelbrecht v. McCulloughArizona Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Owings v. BorregoArizona Supreme Court · 1949

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Odom v. First National Bank of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1959
  2. State Tax Commission v. Graybar Electric CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Hunter Contracting Co. v. Sanner Contracting Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
  4. Kay v. BiggsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
  5. Contractor & Mining Service & Supply, Inc. v. H & M Tractor & Bearing Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1966

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API