Legal Opinion
Infusaid Corp. v. Intermedics Infusaid, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided May 30, 1984No. Nos. 83-1841, 83-1882PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PETTINE, Senior District Judge.
In No. 83-1841, appellants Metal Bellows and Infusaid are both incorporated in Delaware with their principal place of business in Massachusetts. Infusaid Corporation is Metal Bellows’ majority-owned subsidiary. Appellees Intermedies Infusaid and Intermedies are Texas corporations with their principal places of business in that state. The former appellee is the wholly-owned subsidiary of the latter, and throughout this opinion they are identified collectively as “Intermedies”.
Central to this litigation is a device known as the infusion pump, a small, self-powered…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Donahue v. Rodd Electrotype Co. of New England, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Karrick v. HannamanSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Shain Investment Co., Inc. v. CohenMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1982
- State Street Trust Co. v. HallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Rodgers v. RAB Investments, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1991
- Ann B. Hopkins v. Price WaterhouseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
- Ross-Simons of Warwick, Inc. v. Baccarat, Inc.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1999
- Caruso v. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1987
- Ginzburg v. Martínez-DávilaUnited States District Court · 2019
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.