Legal Opinion

At & T ALASCOM v. Orchitt

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 2007No. S-12058PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EASTAUGH, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

John Orchitt was exposed to radio frequency radiation in an accident while he worked for AT & T Alascom. After a contested hearing, the Alaska Workers’ Compensation Board awarded him temporary total disability and medical benefits. AT & T unsuccessfully appealed to the superior court, alleging that procedural irregularities deprived it of due process and that the board’s decision was not supported by competent scientific evidence. Because substantial evidence supports the board’s findings and because the board's procedural decisions did not deprive AT &…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Schweiker v. McClureSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Kelly v. ZamarelloAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Adamson v. University of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Handley v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 1992

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Button v. Haines BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Gottstein v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Copeland v. BallardAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Pietro v. Unocal Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Calvert v. State, Department of Labor & Workforce Development, Employment Security DivisionAlaska Supreme Court · 2011

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API