Pietro v. Unocal Corp.
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FABE, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
A worker developed peripheral neuropathy in his feet and was later diagnosed with skin cancer. He asked for workers' compensation benefits for both of these conditions, alleging that they developed as a result of his exposure to arsenic during the course of his work at a fertilizer plant. The Alaska Workers' Compensation Board rejected his claims, finding that he had not proven that his conditions were work related, and the superior court affirmed the Board. We affirm the Board's finding that the employer rebutted the presumption of compensability. But…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- DeYonge v. Nana/MarriottAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
- Veco, Inc. v. WolferAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
- Beauchamp v. Employers Liability Assurance Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1970
- Grove v. Alaska Construction & ErectorsAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
- Dougan v. Aurora Electric Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2002
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Shea v. State, Department of Administration, Division of Retirement & BenefitsAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
- Morrison v. Alaska Interstate Constr. Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2019
- Gregory Weaver v. ASRC Federal Holding Co. and Arctic Slope Regional Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 2020
- Coppe v. BleicherAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
- Rivera v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2011
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.