Legal Opinion

Great Northern Savings Co. v. Ingarra

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1981No. 80-875PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

In the past decade there have been numerous decisions regarding the enforceability of clauses such as the one contained in paragraph seven of appellees’ second mortgage deed, known as “due on sale” clauses. Some jurisdictions have held that such clauses are enforceable only when the obligee can demonstrate a threat to one of its legitimate interests regarding the property or the obligation itself.

These jurisdictions have determined that “due on sale” clauses constitute significant restraints on alienation and that enforcement of such clauses cannot be justified by any positive effect such…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Wellenkamp v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Tucker v. Lassen Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Baker v. Loves Park Savings & Loan Ass'nIllinois Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Crockett v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  5. Malouff v. Midland Federal Savings and Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Toledo v. Perry's Landing, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Blue Ash Building & Loan Co. v. HahnOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Martin v. Peoples Mutual Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
  4. First Investment Co. v. Custer (In Re Custer)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1982
  5. Lake v. Equitable Savings & Loan Ass'nIdaho Supreme Court · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API