Legal Opinion
Trimble v. Steinfeldt
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 11, 1986No. B009727PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
178 Cal.App.3d 646 (1986)
224 Cal. Rptr. 195
MERYL TRIMBLE, Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
STEPHEN STEINFELDT et al., Defendants; BRUCE G. FAGEL, Claimant and Respondent.
Docket No. B009727.
Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division One.
March 11, 1986.
COUNSEL
Samuel Shore and David M. Luboff for Plaintiff and Appellant.
No appearance for Claimant and Respondent.
OPINION
SPENCER, P.J.
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Meryl Trimble appeals from an order denying her motion to expunge a lien which respondent, Attorney Bruce G. Fagel, filed in plaintiff's suit against Stephen Steinfeldt, M.D., and others.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Fracasse v. BrentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Isrin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- Howe v. Key System Transit Co.California Supreme Court · 1926
- Cetenko v. United California BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Pollack v. LytleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Marsh v. Mountain Zephyr, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1996
- United Pacific Insurance v. Hanover InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Jones v. Los Angeles Community College DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Carroll v. Interstate Brands Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2002
- Plummer v. Day/Eisenberg, LLPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.