Legal Opinion
Pollack v. Lytle
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 25, 1981No. Civ. 58089PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*936Opinion
SPENCER, P. J.—
Introduction
Plaintiff William Jerome Pollack appeals from an order of dismissal1 as to defendant Robert C. Lytle which was entered after the trial court sustained without leave to amend defendant’s demurrer to the first (fraud), second (reasonable value of services), and fifth (declaratory relief) causes of action of plaintiff’s third amended complaint. The order sustaining the demurrers recited that plaintiff’s fourth cause of action, seeking indemnity, “is off calendar as plaintiff orally dismisses it without prejudice.”
Statement of Facts2
During January 1974, plaintiff…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Barquis v. Merchants Collection Assn.California Supreme Court · 1972
- Fracasse v. BrentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Wyatt v. Union Mortgage Co.California Supreme Court · 1979
- Buckaloo v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Porten v. University of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Small v. Fritz Companies, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2003
- Cantu v. Resolution Trust Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1992
- Cicone v. URS Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1986
- Michelson v. HamadaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Beckwith v. DahlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.