Carroll v. Interstate Brands Corp.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
JONES, P. J.
The question before us in this appeal is whether the trial court properly ordered an attorney’s lien “expunged.” We conclude the trial court lacked jurisdiction to assess the validity of the lien, and we reverse the order.
Background
In two consolidated actions below, trial was held on the claims of several plaintiffs for damages resulting from race-based employment discrimination. All 23 plaintiffs were initially represented by the Law Offices of Joseph Alioto and Angela Alioto (hereafter Alioto). Alioto in turn hired Attorney Waukeen Q. McCoy to perform certain legal work…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Ginns v. SavageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- Isrin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- Weiss v. MarcusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Cetenko v. United California BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Wagner v. SariottiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- United States v. KimCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Fletcher v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Plummer v. Day/Eisenberg, LLPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- People v. HendersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- King County v. Seawest Investment Associates, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.