Legal Opinion
United Pacific Insurance v. Hanover Insurance
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 31, 1990No. C002818PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DAVIS, J,—
United Pacific Insurance Company (United Pacific), plaintiff below, appeals from the trial court’s decision to leave undisturbed an arbitrator’s proration of insurance coverage among the three parties to this dispute. Hanover Insurance Company (Hanover), a defendant below, cross-appeals from the judgment. We shall conclude that the trial court’s decision to leave the parties as it found them gives them all the equity they deserve. Accordingly, we shall affirm.
Factual and Procedural Background
The pertinent facts are undisputed. On December 1, 1982, Robert White was injured. He…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Pauline v. FitzpatrickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- In Re Marriage of SkelleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Employers Mutual Liability Insurance v. Pacific Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1959
- American Automobile Insurance v. Seaboard Surety Co.California Court of Appeal · 1957
- Taormino v. DennyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Gallo v. AcunaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Ladas v. California State Automobile Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- City of San Diego v. United States Gypsum Co.California Court of Appeal · 1994
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Nationwide InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Grant v. List & LathropCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.