Bank of Pinehurst v. Derby
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.
By bearing tbe two motions together the defendant was apparently disadvantaged, for he could not resist the plaintiff’s motion in its entirety or that part asking for judgment by default, without waving his special appearance. Scott v. Life Assn., 137 N. C., 515, 50 S. E., 221. Nor could he ask for time to plead to the merits without making a general appearance. Abbitt v. Gregory, 195 N. C., 203, 141 S. E., 587; Currie v. Mining Co., 157 N. C., 209, 72 S. E., 980. He gave notice of appeal from the denial of his motion, which was his right. Denton v. Vassiliades, 212 N. C., 513, 193 S. E.,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Currie v. Golconda Mining & Milling Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- Scott v. Life Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
- Scott v. . Life AssociationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
- Denton v. . VassiliadesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
- Abbitt v. . GregorySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
3Cited by10 opinions
- In Re BlalockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Williams v. . CooperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- Bank v. . DerbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- New Hanover County v. . SidburySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- Harris v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.