Legal Opinion

Denton v. . Vassiliades

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 24, 1937PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

Without debating the question whether lis pendens may be used instead of attachment in service of process where the defendants are nonresidents of the State, suffice it to say the affidavit filed by plaintiffs’ attorney in the instant case is insufficient to procure service of summons by publication. Martin v. Martin, 205 N. C., 157, 170 S. E., 651. It is not averred in the affidavit, as required by O. S., 484, that the defendants “cannot, after due diligence, be found in the State.” This is an essential requirement, and it must be made to appear “to the satisfaction of the court.” Bethell v.…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Commercial Mutual Accident Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  2. Fowler v. FowlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  3. Wheeler v. . CobbSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1876
  4. Harrell v. . WelsteadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  5. Fowler v. . FowlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. In Re BlalockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  2. Powell v. . TurpinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  3. Johnson v. Pilot Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  4. Casey v. . BarkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  5. Rodriguez v. . RodriguezSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API