Legal Opinion · Dissent

Scott v. . Life Association

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 21, 1905PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1DissentBrown, J.

The plaintiff alleges that the defendant had wrongfully canceled his policy after he had paid thereon in fees, annual dues, and mortuary assessments the sum of $521.65, and to recover that sum he sued in this action. The defendant being a nonresident insurance company, process was served on the Insurance Commissioner, as provided by Laws 1899, ch. 54. At February Term, 1902, there was a judgment by default and inquiry, defendant having failed to appear, and the record shows (517) that at May Term, 1902, the inquiry was executed, and a verdict and judgment for the above amount and interest,…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Tyler v. . CapehartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
  2. Bankers Life Insurance v. RobbinsNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Cohen v. TrowbridgeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1870
  4. Williamson v. . HartmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
  5. Nicholes v. People ex rel. KocherspergerIllinois Supreme Court · 1897

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. In Re BlalockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  2. Vestal v. Moseley Vending MacHine Exchange, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  3. Rodriguez v. . RodriguezSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  4. Temple v. TempleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  5. Denton v. . VassiliadesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API